Loading problems...
TL;DR: Instead of minimizing the characters taken from the ends, invert the problem to maximize the length of the contiguous substring left in the middle while ensuring the remaining characters satisfy the count requirement.
The problem asks us to find the minimum number of characters we must remove from the beginning (left) and end (right) of a string s such that we have collected at least k instances of 'a', 'b', and 'c'. If the total count of any character in the string is less than k, it is impossible, and we return -1.
This is a popular interview question that tests your ability to transform a "two-sided" problem into a linear array problem. The LeetCode 2516 Solution relies on recognizing that minimizing the removed elements is mathematically equivalent to maximizing the contiguous elements that remain.
A naive approach attempts to simulate taking characters directly. We might try every possible combination of taking i characters from the left and j characters from the right.
i from 0 to n.j from 0 to n - i.s[0...i-1] and s[n-j...n-1].i + j and update the minimum.Pseudo-code:
pythonmin_len = infinity for i from 0 to n: for j from 0 to n - i: current_selection = s[0:i] + s[n-j:n] if counts(current_selection) satisfy k: min_len = min(min_len, i + j)
Why it fails: The time complexity of this approach is because of the nested loops. Given the constraint , an solution requires roughly operations, which far exceeds the typical limit of operations per second. This results in a Time Limit Exceeded (TLE) error.
The key intuition for Take K of Each Character From Left and Right is essentially "Problem Inversion."
Directly deciding how many characters to take from the left and right is difficult because the two decisions are coupled; taking more from the left might allow taking fewer from the right, but they are separated by the middle of the string.
However, the characters we don't take form a single contiguous substring in the middle of the string. Let the total length of the string be . Let the number of characters taken be . Let the number of characters left in the middle be . We know that . To minimize (taken characters), we must maximize (the middle substring).
The Constraint:
For a middle substring to be valid, the characters remaining outside of it (the prefix and suffix) must contain at least k of 'a', 'b', and 'c'.
Mathematically, if the total count of 'a' is and the count of 'a' inside our middle window is , then we must maintain:
(And similarly for 'b' and 'c').
This transformation converts the problem into finding the longest substring where the counts of characters inside the substring do not exceed .
Visual Description:
Imagine the string as a fixed bar. We slide a window (the middle section) across this bar. As the window expands to the right (including more characters in the "ignore" pile), we check if we have "ignored" too many of a specific character. If Total - Window < k, it means we have kept too many inside the window and haven't left enough for the prefix/suffix. We then shrink the window from the left until the condition is restored.

Let's trace s = "aabaaaacaabc", k = 2.
Length .
Total Counts: A: 8, B: 2, C: 2.
Window Expansion:
right=0 ('a'): Window{'a':1}. Valid. Max len = 1.right=1 ('a'): Window{'a':2}. Valid. Max len = 2.right=2 ('b'): Window{'a':2, 'b':1}. Invalid (Limit for B is 0).
left. Remove 'a'. Window{'a':1, 'b':1}. Still Invalid.left. Remove 'a'. Window{'b':1}. Still Invalid.left. Remove 'b'. Window{}. Valid.right=3 ('a'): Window{'a':1}. Valid. Max len = 2 (unchanged? No, current is 1. Max remains 2).Correction on Logic Application: The example output is 8, meaning the window length is . Let's re-verify the "Allowed Inside" logic. Total: A=8, B=2, C=2. k=2. We need 2 of each outside. We have exactly 2 'b's and 2 'c's total. So, if we put 'b' or 'c' inside the window, the outside count drops to 1, which is . Therefore, the window can ONLY contain 'a's. The longest substring of only 'a's is "aaaa" (index 3 to 6). Length 4. Result: . Correct.
Algorithm Steps:
count array for current window.ans = 0 (max window length).right from 0 to n:
s[right] to window count.count[s[right]] > total[s[right]] - k:
s[left] from window count.left++.ans = max(ans, right - left + 1).n - ans.The algorithm's correctness relies on the invariant maintained by the sliding window. At every step right, the while loop ensures that the window s[left...right] is valid. A valid window implies that for every character , window_count[c] <= total_count[c] - k. Rearranging this inequality gives total_count[c] - window_count[c] >= k. Since total - window represents the count of characters outside the window (prefix + suffix), the invariant guarantees that the prefix and suffix combined satisfy the problem's condition. By finding the maximum length of such a window, we mathematically minimize the length of the prefix + suffix.
cppclass Solution { public: int takeCharacters(string s, int k) { int n = s.length(); // Count total occurrences of a, b, c vector<int> total(3, 0); for (char c : s) { total[c - 'a']++; } // Check if solution is possible if (total[0] < k || total[1] < k || total[2] < k) { return -1; } // Sliding window to find max length of middle part int maxWindow = 0; int left = 0; vector<int> window(3, 0); for (int right = 0; right < n; right++) { int charIndex = s[right] - 'a'; window[charIndex]++; // Shrink window if we took too many characters inside // (leaving too few outside) while (window[charIndex] > total[charIndex] - k) { window[s[left] - 'a']--; left++; } maxWindow = max(maxWindow, right - left + 1); } return n - maxWindow; } };
javaclass Solution { public int takeCharacters(String s, int k) { int n = s.length(); int[] total = new int[3]; // Count total occurrences for (char c : s.toCharArray()) { total[c - 'a']++; } // Check feasibility if (total[0] < k || total[1] < k || total[2] < k) { return -1; } int[] window = new int[3]; int left = 0; int maxWindow = 0; for (int right = 0; right < n; right++) { int charIndex = s.charAt(right) - 'a'; window[charIndex]++; // If window contains too many of current char, shrink from left // "Too many" means remaining outside < k while (window[charIndex] > total[charIndex] - k) { window[s.charAt(left) - 'a']--; left++; } maxWindow = Math.max(maxWindow, right - left + 1); } return n - maxWindow; } }
pythonclass Solution: def takeCharacters(self, s: str, k: int) -> int: n = len(s) # Map 'a', 'b', 'c' to 0, 1, 2 for array indexing total = [0] * 3 for char in s: total[ord(char) - ord('a')] += 1 # If total counts are insufficient, return -1 if any(count < k for count in total): return -1 window = [0] * 3 left = 0 max_window = 0 for right in range(n): idx = ord(s[right]) - ord('a') window[idx] += 1 # Shrink window if remaining characters outside < k # Equivalent to checking if window[idx] > total[idx] - k while window[idx] > total[idx] - k: left_idx = ord(s[left]) - ord('a') window[left_idx] -= 1 left += 1 max_window = max(max_window, right - left + 1) return n - max_window
Time Complexity:
We iterate through the string with the right pointer exactly once. The left pointer also moves at most times (it only moves forward). Operations inside the loop (hash map/array updates) are since the alphabet size is fixed at 3 ('a', 'b', 'c'). Thus, the total time is linear.
Space Complexity: We use a fixed-size array (or hash map) of size 3 to store character counts. This does not scale with input size .
The Sliding Window - Variable Size pattern is versatile. Understanding how to invert the condition (looking for what remains rather than what is taken) applies to:
In LeetCode 2516, the twist is maximizing the window to minimize the complement, whereas LeetCode 76 minimizes the window directly.
Q: Why does my solution get Time Limit Exceeded (TLE)? Mistake: Using a nested loop to test every combination of left prefix size and right suffix size. Concept Gap: This creates an algorithm. The sliding window pattern reduces this to . The solution fails for .
Q: Why does my code return -1 even when a solution exists?
Mistake: Incorrectly initializing the feasibility check.
Concept Gap: You must verify that total_count[char] >= k for all characters before starting the window logic. If the string doesn't even contain k 'a's initially, no amount of taking will help.
Consequence: Correctness failure on edge cases.
Q: Why is my answer off by one?
Mistake: Calculating window size as right - left instead of right - left + 1, or incorrectly subtracting from n.
Concept Gap: The window length is inclusive. The number of characters removed is Total Length - Max Window Length.
Consequence: Wrong answer.
Q: Why do I get negative indices or errors?
Mistake: Not handling the case where total[char] - k is negative inside the loop logic (though the initial check should catch this) or confusing the logic of "count inside" vs "count outside".
Concept Gap: The condition window[i] > total[i] - k is the precise mathematical inversion of total[i] - window[i] < k. Stick to one mental model.